Empty inbox brings peace of mind

Let’s cut the crap: I’m a fan-boy, plain and simple. I’m an Apple fan-boy and I’m a Google fan-boy. I love the simplicity of the products they create, and for the most part everything just works. I’ve been using Gmail since 2004 when it was still in closed beta and have never felt the need to use anything else. Somehow though, it took me almost six years to realize I was using it all wrong.

For all this time I have been lazily reading and composing mail, using a few filters to get those incoming messages bagged and tagged but keeping every single e-mail in the inbox. It was only a month or so ago I realized the beauty of the Archive button, which was only sporadically used before. Since then I’ve got a very clear work-flow for dealing with all my mail.

The main goal is to keep your inbox empty. If you haven’t seen an empty inbox since the last trembling months of the last millennium you have no idea what you’re missing. It really gives a feeling of peace to see that nothingness stare back at you – no judgment for not replying, no expectation to be populated, just a blank slate. This is not always possible though, but most of the time I do manage to keep it empty.

Whenever a new e-mail pops in, I read it. Now, that’s not so hard? Once read I decide if I can answer it right at this moment, and if I can, I do. Thereafter I archive the conversation and move on. Archiving obviously also goes for informational messages that does not need any reply. Those e-mails that I expect to be able to answer in the next day or two are allowed to remain read in the inbox. That’s pretty much it!

Now, you may ask yourself “How about e-mails that I won’t be able to give an answer to until a further date?”. The answer to that is for you to reply immediately and write exactly that, and we are magically back to step one. For those really important e-mails that I might need to reference for longer periods of time I like to use the Star feature of Gmail.

Is the clutter-free inbox the way of the future or a pointless Getting Things Done-inspired waste of time? Go for comments.

Image by Jim Epler, released under Creative Commons.

  • http://bjornbjorn.myopenid.com/ Bjørn Børresen

    I like your idea of replying immediately even if you won't be able to answer for a couple of days. I use GTD as well and have used a “Waiting for” label for this .. all other labels removed now ;-) Yes I agree, inbox zen feels great :-)

  • Erik Brännström

    I haven’t actually used GTD, but I’m going to borrow Allen’s book from the library to see what all the fuzz is about. My expectations are sky-high! :)

  • http://zackhovatter.com Zack Hovatter

    You are so absolutely right about archiving and empty inboxes. I just emptied mine of things that have been sitting there for up to a year (reminders/etc) and it's already a lot nicer checking my email and instantly seeing that it's empty or a new message.

  • Anonymous

    Thanks for your comments guys! It has really changed my feelings toward my inbox ;)

  • Anonymous

    It’s not a waste of time, it’s a requirement for survival if you get a lot of work email. Since I started working at Ericsson I’ve received hundreds of emails, and I am currently setting up inbox zero on outlook now (horrible!), and I’ve only worked for four days! But it’s safe to say there is no possibility I could waste time to identify all emails I should reply to or even read, before I setup inbox zero. Just looking at a full inbox makes me sad nowadays :P

blog comments powered by Disqus